There are 3 common interpretations by conservatives that I've found.
The first one I wouldn't buy even if it was on sale:
1) The "perfect" is the Bible in codex form (some even say KJV in specific) and is used as an ambiguous prooftext that the Bible is a total replacement for the revelatory gifts of prophecy and tongues. I personally do NOT speak in tongues NOR do I ever offer revelatory prophecy, but using this text to say it's been done away with is abuse of the Scriptures, there's no way to logically prove this interpretation without hermeneutical gymnastics.
The other two sound more plausible:
2) The Second Coming of Christ: Whether folks interpret this as the rapture, or His coming to establish the Millenium, or however they interpret the 2nd Coming of Christ. Christ is the only thing humanly speaking worth calling "perfect". I'm still not convinced on this one, but certainly more sensible than the above statement.
3) The New Jerusalem (aka Heaven) and our resurrected, glorified state: this is the one I lean toward. Look closely at Paul's discourse in ch 13, he's taking you on a time travel. He says "love never ends. Then he also says when I was a child, I spoke like a child, when I became a man, I put aside childish things. Comparing a child to a man seems to be to be an analogy of comparing the glorified man to the current state of sinful man. He says "we will see face to face...know fully....and be fully known". This still further suggests to me the glorified state.
"perfect" in the Greek is τὸ τέλειον, meaning "completed", which, of course, stiff further suggests the glorified state.
|